Monday

Diabolus in Musica


The rise of the MP3 player has meant that song playlists have become part of our everyday life, with vast selections of music available right at our fingertips. One of the beautiful things about music is its ability to evoke strong emotions within the listener, it can trigger old memories, it can rouse the passion inside, and it can cover a heart with clouds. Its universal appeal means that everyone will find themselves influenced and affected by a song at some point in their life. But when you have the ability to change lives, and indeed the world, how much can music reveal about the lives and actions of some of the world's most influential figures?

Recognised in a BBC poll to be the greatest-ever Britain, Winston Churchill galvanised a country when it was needed most. His steely resolve in the face of the overwhelming pressure faced from the opposing forces in the Second World War made him a figure of inspiration to the citizens of Briton. Churchill's strength and patriotism is clearly visible in the song 'Battle Hymn of The Republic', a song played at his funeral, and one that supposedly brought a tear to Churchill's eye whenever he heard it. A fervently patriotic song, it was have had a strong resonance with Churchill during the war, and with lyrics such as “let us die to make men free” there can be little doubt that this song would have inspired Churchill in times of trouble.
On the other side of the English Channel, Hitler was well known to be a fan of the composer Robert Wagner, not just his music, but also his anti-semitic writings that the Nazi Party used in their own propaganda. Many of Wagner's opera extensively use the tritone, a musical interval that spans three whole tones. In medieval times, this musical characteristic was called the Devil's Interval, because of the dissonance created by this sound. It creates dark and atmospheric music, the kind of music that typifies the way that Hitler slowly, but inexorably brought most of Europe under his power. While it is foolish to say that Hitler only liked Wagner because of the supposed 'evil' connotations behind his music, it is not unreasonable to say that Hitler enjoyed Wagner so much that he let his music and beliefs become an essential part of the Nazi movement.

Richard Nixon was to be one of the first contemporary leaders who openly embraced popular music and showed an interest in playing music himself; Nixon was a proficient pianist, even appearing on the Jack Parr Tonight Show. Nixon appeared to have a keen desire to be seen as a President who was looked at with the same admiration as musicians, and he used his musical abilities to try and raise his public profile. Yet these acts only served to create a caricature of the President, and it can be clear to say that his musical ambition and interest only hindered his image, and had a detrimental effect on his political career.

The current President, George Bush, is known to listen to his iPod whilst out cycling on his ranch in Texas. His own musical tastes reveal a safe, middle of road selection, with no black artists, no genre less than 25 years old, and no world music. Bush has a well documented past of misplaced words and confused sentences, and his unchallenging, simple music tastes reflect the thought process of the man himself. His cycling partner claims it's music to “get over the next hill", and sometimes when watching Bush in action, it seems that this is all he is ever trying to do.

Although music can often have an influence on the character of the listener, it should also be recognised that maybe the listener has chosen that type of music because they see their own personality within that music. Music will always have a place in society, affecting the man on the street, to the man in the Oval Office, and the world is all the more interesting for it. But every now and then it can be interesting to speculate on whether Hitler might have turned out differently if he'd listened more to Debussy as opposed to Wagner.

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Hmm.. Interesting thoughts, particularly about the "devil's Interval". I sometimes think of music as a program we run on our neural hardware, or a kind of hypnotic magic spell that we willingly allow to be cast on ourselves that puts a certain "emotional glaze" on the world and our experiences.
-Or to use another analogy, if music is thought of as emotional food, then... well: there is such a thing as a balanced diet, no? What, Mr. President? No black music? no world music? Don't you fancy a takeaway curry goat occasionally? Gods protect us from the dictates of those with such a limited palate.
Pop? Sweets. Just don't eat too much, you'll make yourself sick.

The film "Baraka" has a scene in which a group of prostitutes are gathered outside a Thai brothel, expressionlessly looking into the camera. The music playing is the end of "The Host of Seraphim" by Dead Can Dance: vaguely choral, slow and emotive.
The effect is one of questioning depth: one finds one's thoughts turning to who these women are, what they experience, why they do what they do...
I wonder at how different the thoughts conjured by the same scene would be if the backing track was gangsta rap...

The (Jewish) composer Gyorgy Ligeti commented that he doubted he would have written such harsh and atonal music if he hadn't experienced the nightmare of Nazism.
I do agree... Music contains the thoughts and feelings, the ideas, even, of the writers and musicians. To listen to music is to open ourselves to vibrational organisms: sound-viruses that can heal or injure, soul-food that can satisfy or pollute.

"You are what you eat."